Crouch v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Daniel D. Fisher, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
This action is prosecuted to enforce the common-law liability of the defendant, as a common carrier for hire, for damages alleged to have been received by a carload of twenty-one horses of the plaintiff, while in transit over its line from East St. Louis, Illinois, to Charleston, South Carolina. The answer imperfectly pleads a special contract, whereby (among other exemptions) the defendant was exempted from liability beyond its own line ; and the principal struggle in the case was, as to whether the plaintiff was bound by this contract. We have come to the conclusion that, in the state of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ball v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Laughlin v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
- Smith v. New York Central Rail RoadNew York Supreme Court · 1864
- Shriver v. Sioux City & St. Paul RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878
- Grover & Baker Sewing Machine Co. v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1879
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hurst v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
- Connelly v. Illinois Central RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
- Bockserman v. St. Louis & Hannibal Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1912
- Dean v. Toledo, St. Louis & Western R. R.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1910
- Flynn v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1891
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.