Legal Opinion

Kurtz v. Solomon

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 29, 1995No. 1-93-3327PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE HOFFMAN

delivered the opinion of the court:

The plaintiffs, Sandra Solomon Kurtz and Susan Kurtz, appeal from the trial court’s judgment in favor of the defendants, Gary Solomon and Gary Solomon & Company, on their complaint seeking an accounting for investments the defendants made on the plaintiffs’ behalf. We consider whether it was against the manifest weight of the evidence for the trial judge to find that: (1) there was no express trust between the plaintiffs and Solomon; (2) there was no fiduciary relationship between the plaintiffs and Solomon and, therefore, no basis…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kalata v. Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Charles Hester Enterprises, Inc. v. Illinois Founders InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Grossinger Motorcorp, Inc. v. American National Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  4. Suttles v. VogelIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Van Molligan v. The Board of Fire & Police Commisioners of the Village of GlenviewIllinois Supreme Court · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Neade v. PortesIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Susan Ball v. Cherie KotterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  3. Cumis Insurance Society, Inc. v. PetersDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
  4. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Lois/USA, Inc. v. Conseco Finance Servicing Corp. (In Re Lois/USA, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  5. Kinesoft Development Corp. v. Softbank Holdings Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API