Legal Opinion

United States v. Private E1 CARLOS A. GONZALES-GOMEZ

Army Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided November 30, 2016No. ARMY 20121100PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

MULLIGAN, Senior Judge:

For the same act, the government charged appellant with forcible sodomy, abusive sexual contact, and wrongful sexual contact. After the panel returned a guilty verdict to all three specifications, the government moved that the sexual contact offenses be dismissed *966as being unreasonably multiplied. The military judge denied the motion. In his first assignment of error, appellant asks us to do what the trial judge did not. The government on appeal does not oppose appellant’s requested relief.

In his second assignment of error, appellant asks this court…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. TardifCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
  2. United States v. QuirozCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
  3. United States v. TooheyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  4. United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
  5. United States v. CollazoArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Private E1 CARLOS A. GONZALEZ-GOMEZArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API