Roy F. Diebold v. Civil Service Commission of St. Louis County, Etc.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, Circuit Judge.
This appeal poses the difficult constitutional question of whether an indicted individual’s fifth amendment privilege against self-incrimination is threatened if he must participate in an administrative proceeding, as the sole means of contesting the loss of his job, which involves consideration of matters related to or similar to those for which a criminal indictment has been issued. Even where, as here, the accused employee is free to assert the privilege in the administrative proceeding, the choices available to him are still undesirable. He may either elect to remain…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United Public Workers of America v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Uniformed Sanitation Men Ass'n v. Commissioner of Sanitation of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Kenneth Adams v. Terrel H. Bell, Individually, and as Secretary of the Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- D'ACQUISTO v. WashingtonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
- Teresa G. Hoover v. Dewey W. Knight, Jr., Individually, and as Interim County Manager of Dade County, FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- State of Oklahoma, Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. GasawaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Smith v. CharnesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.