Legal Opinion
Eunice Clinic & Hospital, Inc. v. Baldwin
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 8, 1936No. 1600PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DORE, Judge.
This is an action to recover the sum of $415 for surgical, medical, and hospital services rendered by plaintiff to a boy fifteen or sixteen years old, Vorise La-fleur, who was seriously injured on January 5, 1934, while attempting to board a train at Eunice of the New Orleans, Texas & Mexico Railway Company, operated by the defendants as trustees. The railroad company, through these trustees, denies that it is liable for these services rendered this boy, and denies that any promises to pay for the services were ever made by the railroad, but if such promises were made to pay for…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- O'Ferrall v. Nashville Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
- Great Southern Lumber Co. v. BatesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
3Cited by2 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Associated Pipe & Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Continental Casualty Company, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Associated Pipe & Supply Co., Inc., Thomas Jordan, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross Texaco, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Associated Pipe & Supply Co., Inc., Thomas Jordan, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross United Tugs, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. Continental Casualty Company, Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971