Legal Opinion

Siedlik v. Schneider

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1932No. 28115PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Broady, District Judge.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries received in an automobile accident. The plaintiff is a boy seven years of age, and he, together with other boys of a like age, were playing football on a public municipal playground. Larger boys, among whom were high school students, were likewise playing ball and engaged in other athletic sports on other parts of the field, when *764the defendant, a youth approximately twenty years of age, drove his father’s car upon the grounds toward the group of smaller boys, who, at the approach of defendant’s car, scattered.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. De Griselles v. GansNebraska Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Trute v. HoldenNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Mannion v. TalboyNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Linch v. Nebraska Buick Automobile Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Gerish v. HincheyNebraska Supreme Court · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Eckhardt v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  2. Armer ex rel. Armer v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Tews ex rel. Tews v. BamrickNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Tyler v. WeedMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Bear v. AuguyNebraska Supreme Court · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API