Legal Opinion
Wheeler v. Smoot
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 4, 1938No. 27453PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court. Plaintiff brought this action to dispossess the defendant and to recover certain real estate located in Roger Mills county. The relevant part of the answer filed by the defendant alleged that Robert Wheeler and Manta Wheeler were the owners of the land in question, and that the plaintiff claimed title by virtue of a judgment void on its face.
The judgment referred to in the answer was rendered in former cause No. 3188 in the district court of Roger Mills county purporting to foreclose a tax lien and styled Olson v. Vance, and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Baker v. LeavittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Smith v. BraleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
3Cited by5 opinions
- Frater Oklahoma Realty Corp. v. ALLEN LAUHON HDWE. CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Hine v. Board of Com'rs of McClain CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Poarch v. FinkelsteinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Texas Title Guaranty Co. v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Cook v. Ripley Consolidated School District No. 3Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939