Legal Opinion

Lipmanowich v. Crookston Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 30, 1926No. 25,451PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lees, C.

In the course of his employment, Joseph Medas was accidentally killed in Beltrami county on February 1, 1916. He and his employer were subject to the Workmen’s Compensation Act in force at that time, L. 1923, p. 675, c. 467, as amended by L. 1915, p. 285, c. 209. Section 20A of the amendment provides that- the period within which dependents may bring an action to recover compensation shall be limited to “one year after the date of notice in writing given by the employer to the Department of Labor of the state, stating his willingness to pay compensation when it is shown that the death…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Central Union Trust Co. of NY v. GarvanSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Miller v. RouseDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1921
  3. Kannellos v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  4. Soderstrom v. Curry & Whyte, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  5. Kolundjija v. Hanna Ore Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Schrabauer v. Schneider Engraving Product, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Pine v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. Szroka v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  4. Southern Railway Co. v. GrigsbyTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Martini, Et Ux. v. Coal Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API