Fry v. Hurst
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1DissentBlackbird, Justice
I respectfully, dissent to the opinion of the majority. They, like the trial court appears to have done, have become confused as to the issues in this type of case, and have allowed the controlling issue, as between Mr. and Mrs. Hurst and Mr. and Mrs. Fry, to be determined, or overshadowed, by considerations which have little, or no, bearing upon it.
Surely all will agree that, where, through some mistake, inadvertence or ineptness, the language of a deed delivered by the vendor to the vendee of real estate is insufficient to adequately or correctly describe the particular interest or estate…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Cooper v. FlesnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Daniel v. TolonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Midland Valley R. Co. v. SutterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Rose v. CookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.