Legal Opinion

The Norwood

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided July 9, 1914No. 1265PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Admiralty. Suit for collision by the Grays Harbor Construction Company against the steamship Norwood, Sudden & Christensen, claimants, and the Soule Tug & Barge Company, owner of the tug Hoquiam.

1Opinion of the Court

CUSHMAN, District Judge.

[1] A libel was filed herein to recover damages on account of a collision between the steamship Nor-wood and a scow belonging to libelant. Claimant answered, denying negligence in the navigation of the Norwood, and alleging that, at the time of the collision, the Norwood was in the exclusive control, direction, and management of the tug Hoquiam and its master, which was towing the Norwood down the Hoquiam river, and averring that the collision was either the result of an inevitable accident, or due to negligence on the part of the tug and contributory negligence on the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. The ConquerorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. The Schooner Catharine v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  3. Smith v. CondrySupreme Court of the United States · 1843
  4. The Granite StateSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  5. Williamson v. BarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1852

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hanson K. Dreijer, D/B/A Hanson Dreijer Marine Enterprises v. Girod Motor Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  2. The PatriciaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API