Legal Opinion

Bowers v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 8, 1979No. Appeal, No. 2066 C.D. 1978PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Wilkinson, Jr.,

Claimant was employed as a laborer and drill press operator. The employer occupies four floors of a building, each floor with approximately 250 square feet and employs 70 employees. Claimant was discharged for spitting on the floor after he had been reprimanded and warned not to do so.

Not surprisingly the Bureau of Employment Security, the referee, and the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, after a remand hearing, all denied benefits. We affirm.

The claimant presents two arguments. First, since the Company had rules for discipline, and not spitting on the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kentucky Fried Chicken of Altoona, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Roebuck v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harmon v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Sommers v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API