Legal Opinion

O. M. Cockrum Co. v. Klein

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1905No. 20,539PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From Gibson Circuit Court; O. M. Welborn, Judge. Action by Philip Klein against the O. M. Cockrum Company. Erom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Transferred from Appellate Court under §1337u Burns 1901, Acts 1901, p. 590.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

This action was instituted by appellee to recover the price of some barrels and head-liners alleged to have been sold by him to appellant. The complaint is on an account in the usual form. There are three answers: first, the general denial; the second alleges payment; and the third sets up that appellee accepted the note of O. M. Cockrum in payment. Reply by denial. There was a trial by jury, and a verdict and judgment for appellee for full price of the goods. The overruling of appellant’s motion for a new trial presents the only questions for decision.

1. Among the reasons for a new trial was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wolfe v. PughIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. HubbardIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Gates v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. CauleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Southern Product Co. v. Franklin Coil Hoop Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Romine v. ThayerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Chicago & Erie Railroad v. BargerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924
  4. Godwin v. DeMotteIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. ShrinerIndiana Supreme Court · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API