Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Rowe

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1978No. 13176PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GORDON, Justice:

In 1974, the parties obtained a dissolution of their marriage through a default proceeding. At that time, their property settlement agreement, which provided for spousal maintenance of $275 per month and child support of an equal amount, was incorporated into the dissolution decree. Approximately a year later, William Rowe successfully petitioned the superior court to modify the decree. Phyllis Rowe filed an appeal, and we have taken jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 47(e) 17A A.R.S. Rules of the Supreme Court.

Predicating its modification order the court found, inter alia :

“6.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burkhardt v. BurkhardtArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Jarvis v. JarvisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  3. Hornbaker v. HornbakerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  4. Alford v. AlfordCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hodges v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  2. Scott v. ScottArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Brevick v. BrevickCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  4. Chaney v. ChaneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  5. Beck v. JaegerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API