Legal Opinion

Fotterall v. Hilleary

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 23, 1940No. [No. 32, April Term, 1940.]PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOffutt, J.

This appeal is from a judgment of the Baltimore City Court in favor of the plaintiff in an action brought by Joseph R. Hilleary, the appellee, against Walter L. Fotterall, Jr., appellant, to recover compensation for injuries caused by an automobile operated by the defendant.

The single exception submitted was taken to the refusal of the trial court to direct a verdict for the defendant, and the issue tendered is whether the evidence in the case was legally sufficient to permit a recovery. Giving due effect to the rule that in dealing with such an issue all evidence tending to support the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dempsey v. HortonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  2. Holler v. LoweryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  3. Mahan v. State Ex Rel. CarrCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
  4. Dashiell v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1940
  5. Yockel v. GerstadtCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wood v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  2. Flohr v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  3. Heffner v. Admiral Taxi Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
  4. Wiggins v. State, Use of CollinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  5. Belleson v. KlohrCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API