Legal Opinion

Walrus Manufacturing Co. v. Quackenbush

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 4, 1929No. 28,594PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action was one on a redelivery bond given in a replevin action. Plaintiff recovered, and defendants appeal.

Plaintiff commenced an action of replevin in the city court of Wichita against Quackenbush to obtain possession of personal property valued at $440 in the affidavit and order of delivery. Quackenbush gave a redelivery bond signed by himself and Hoff, and kept possession of the property. Judgment was rendered in favor of the manufacturing company for possession of the property or its value with interest. Quackenbush appealed to the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. MoggeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  2. Walrus Manufacturing Co. v. QuackenbushSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API