Legal Opinion

Almeida v. N.A.R., Inc.

District Court, D. Utah

Decided December 19, 2022No. 2:22-cv-00423Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CRISTIANO ALMEIDA, MEMORANDUM DECISION Plaintiff, AND ORDER vs. Case No. 2:22-CV-423-DAK-DAO N.A.R., INC., Judge Dale A. Kimball Defendant. Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg This matter is before the court on Defendant N.A.R. Inc.’s (“NAR”) Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 8] and Rule 12(b)(1) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Standing [ECF No. 9]. On December 7, 2022, the court held a hearing on the motions via Zoom videoconferencing due to the Covid-19 pandemic. At the hearing, Robert Yusko represented Plaintiff Cristiano…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kansas Judicial Review v. StoutCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. $148,840.00 in United States CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  3. Looney, Atty. Gen. v. Eastern Texas R. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. RMA Ventures California v. SunAmerica Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  5. Snow, Nuffer, Engstrom & Drake v. TanasseUtah Supreme Court · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API