Legal Opinion

Geltman v. Levy

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1959PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamuel M. Gold, J.

The defendants, Levy, move for dismissal of the complaint pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice for legal insufficiency and pursuant to rule 107 upon the ground that each of the causes therein stated is barred by the applicable Statute of Limitations. The application pursuant to rule 106 has been withdrawn without prejudice.

The deceased died in January, 1948. The defendants, attorneys, represented the plaintiffs and the estate. The deceased had been the owner of 50% of the oustanding capital stock of a corporation.

It is alleged in the first cause of action that in July, 1951,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Posner v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
  2. Dinerman v. SuttonNew York Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Geltman v. LevyNew York Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API