Legal Opinion

Brady v. McCann

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 9, 1925No. Nos. 4375, 4376, 10007PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

From these agreed statements of facts it clearly appears that each of these claimants, while clothed with some discretion in the performance of his respective duties, nevertheless occupied a subordinate position and was under the control and direction of tho general manager. For this reason wo think the services perfoi*mod by each of these claimants comes clearly within the provisions of section 64b (4) of the Bankruptcy Act (Comp. St. § 9648), and, nothing else appearing, they would each he entitled to priority in tho sum of $300 for salary and wages earned within the three months next…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Blessing v. BlanchardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915
  2. In re DexterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1907
  3. Brainard v. IrwinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923
  4. In re Eagle Ice & Coal Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1917
  5. In re H. O. Roberts Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Ko-Ed TavernCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  2. In re Marshall E. Smith & Bro., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. In Re Pacific Oil & Meal Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1938
  4. In re Clover Dairies, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1942
  5. Warner v. KaganCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API