Legal Opinion

Venable v. Patti

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 9, 1973No. 8120PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHADICK, Chief Justice.

The first question for consideration, though not the first to be briefed by the appellants Otis Venable and wife, Bithy Venable, is whether or not appellee Frank Patti has sufficient title to the land in suit to maintain an action in trespass to try title for its recovery. A possessory title is essential to such an action. 56 Tex. Jur.2d Trespass to Try Title, Section 9. Mr. Patti claims title to the land by virtue of a written Contract of Sale and Purchase made pursuant to the provisions of Vernon’s Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 5421m (Texas Veteran’s Land Program). On…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Woolsey v. Panhandle Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Kadane v. ClarkTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Continental Fire & Casualty Ins. Corp. v. American Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  4. Bellah v. First National Bank of HerefordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Murren v. Foster, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1984
  2. McPhail v. Texas Architectural Aggregate, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Holdsworth v. Guthrie TrustCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1989
  5. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API