Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lee v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals & Review

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 6, 1980No. 79-199Published

1DissentFerren, Associate Judge

I respectfully dissent, for I cannot agree that petitioners fail to satisfy the requirements for standing in this court.

In concluding that petitioners have not established an injury in fact sufficient to give them standing, my colleagues ignore the harm the Board’s decision has done to petitioners’ interest in occupying habitable housing. The Housing Regulations of the District of Columbia, 5G DCRR §§ 2401, 2405, require the owner of residential premises to provide and maintain plumbing facilities and utilities. The District is to enforce these regulations, with a view to protecting the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Masszonia v. WashingtonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1971
  3. Anna Masszonia v. Walter E. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Majestic Weaving Co., Inc., of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API