People Ex Rel. Gendron v. Ingram
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice House
The primary issue in this original habeas corpus action is whether the effect of section no — 8 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1965, chap. 38, par. no — 8,) which requires a person making bail for another to deposit cash or stock and bonds equal in value to the amount of the bail or unencumbered real estate in value to twice the amount of the bail, violates section 7 of article II of the constitution. That section provides: “All persons shall be bailable by sufficient sureties, except for capital offenses, where the proof is evident or the presumption great; * * * ”
Section…
2Cited by23 opinions
- Schilb v. KuebelSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Rowe v. RaoulIllinois Supreme Court · 2023
- People v. MayaIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. BriggsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
- People Ex Rel. Davis v. VazquezIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.