Legal Opinion
Carlsen v. Global Client Solutions, LLC
Washington Supreme Court
Decided May 12, 2011No. 84855-6PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFairhurst, J.
¶1 Washington residents who were consumers of allegedly illegal debt adjustment programs filed a class action against Global Client Solutions LLC (GCS) and Rocky Mountain Bank and Trust (RMBT), companies that respectively managed and held special purpose accounts, a key feature of the programs. The United States *491District Court for the Eastern District of Washington has certified to us four questions regarding Washington’s debt adjusting statute, chapter 18.28 RCW.
I. FACTUAL HISTORY
¶2 Heavily indebted Washington consumers, including plaintiffs Chad M. and Shasta Carlsen and Carl and Mary…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. PikeWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Bradburn v. North Central Regional Library DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Bradburn v. NORTH CENT. REGIONAL LIBRARYWashington Supreme Court · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Jametsky v. OlsenWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- Frias v. Asset Foreclosure Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2014
- Carlsen v. Global Client Solutions, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- Allen v. DameronWashington Supreme Court · 2017
- Durant v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2018
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.