Legal Opinion

United States v. Whitcomb

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided March 27, 1992No. ACMR 9100439PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CREAN, Senior Judge:

The appellant, contrary to his pleas, was found guilty by a general court-martial composed of officer members of indecent acts with a child under the age of 16 (two specifications), and taking indecent liberties with a child under the age of 16 (three specifications), in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934 (1982) [hereinafter UCMJ]. The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence of a dishonorable discharge, confinement for six years, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to Private El.

On 24…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  4. United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  5. United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API