Legal Opinion

Vandegrift Forwarding Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 12, 1957No. Reap. Dec. 8826; Entry Nos. 918177; 719067; 767866PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Chief Judge:

These three appeals for reappraisement relate to several different metal articles that are identified on the in*678voice as compacts, combs, pill boxes, perfume fiacons, and lipstick holders. All of the items were entered at the invoice unit prices, less 2 per centum cash discount, packed. Plaintiff claims that the proper basis for appraisement of the articles in question is export value, as defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and that such statutory value is the entered value in each instance. Appraisement was made on the basis of foreign value, as defined…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. MillsUnited States Customs Court · 1946

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Vandergrift Forwarding Co.United States Customs Court · 1958
  2. Vandegrift Forwarding Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API