Cochran v. Canty
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Harrison District Court. — J. B. Rockaeellow, Judge. Action to recover as for the conversion of personal property, on which plaintiff claims to have had a landlord’s lien. The opinion states the facts. Judgment for defendant in the court below.
1Opinion of the CourtGaynor, J.
1. attaches” This action was originally brought to recover as for a wrongful conversion by the defendant of certain property on which plaintiff claims to have a landlord’s lien for rent. It appears that one J. H. Roberts was the possession of certain premises, owned by the plaintiff, under a lease which terminated on the 15th day of October, 1912; that he had in his possession on said premises certain property amounting in value to about $1,000, and this was subject to plaintiff’s lien for rent under the lease ending October 15, 1912. On the 29th day of August, 1912, and before this lease…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Young v. . DakeNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
- Lee v. CochranSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- Martin v. StearnsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
- Frohardt Bros. v. DuffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Gilbert, Hedge & Co. v. Greenbaum, Schroder & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1881
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- National Investment Trust v. First National BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975