Wilson v. Lightbody
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Harvey District Court. Two actions brought by Wilson against Lightbody and McGee — one action to recover $5,371, the other to recover $2,687. The defendants filed motions in both of these cases to vacate the orders of attáchment therein, which had been levied upon a certain stock of goods situated in the city of Newton, Harvey county. Both motions were heard by the court at the same time.
Read the full summary
Error from Harvey District Court. Two actions brought by Wilson against Lightbody and McGee — one action to recover $5,371, the other to recover $2,687. The defendants filed motions in both of these cases to vacate the orders of attáchment therein, which had been levied upon a certain stock of goods situated in the city of Newton, Harvey county. Both motions were heard by the court at the same time. August 28, 1882, the court made a general finding in each case in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiff, and sustained the motions of the defendants and dissolved the attachments.…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
W. J. Wilson commenced two actions in the district court of Harvey county, against J. W. Lightbody and James McGee. The first action was brought on February 9, 1882, to recover the sum of $5,371, and the second action was brought on February 14,1882, to recover the sum $2,687. In each of these actions an order of attachment was *448obtained. In the first case the order of attachment was issued upon the following grounds, to wit:
“ That said defendants are about to remove their property or a part thereof out of the jurisdiction of the court,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gibbs v. GibbsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- Campbell v. WarnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
3Cited by2 opinions
- McCann v. McCannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Victor B. Buck & Co. v. J. G. Panabaker & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1884