Legal Opinion

206 East 95th Street Associates v. Insurance of State of Pennsylvania

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 3, 1996PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.), entered October 20, 1995, which granted defendant Tishman summary judgment and ordered defendant M&A to indemnify defendant Tishman for any judgment that may be obtained against it in the underlying litigation to a maximum of $5,000,000, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of also directing defendant M&A to provide a defense to defendant Tishman, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The subject language, even if drafted inartfully, does not create an ambiguity, since the parties’ intent is discernable (see, Calce v…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morel v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Weitzner v. Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Delaware Otsego Corp. v. Niagara Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Spencer v. B.A. Painting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. Calce v. FuttermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lenze v. Lehrer McGovern & Bovis, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API