Legal Opinion

Finkelstone v. Lanzke

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1909PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, rendered in the Municipal Court of the city of Mew York, second district, borough of The Bronx.

1Opinion of the CourtSeabury, J.

The facts of this case are undisputed. The defendant assigned to Packard & Co. an unliquidated claim of $228 against these plaintiffs. Packard & Co. sued the plaintiffs and recovered judgment for the full amount of their claim. This judgment the plaintiffs in this action paid.

Upon the trial of the present action the plaintiffs, in addition to the facts recited above, proved by the written admission of the defendant that, at the time the defendant assigned to Packard & Co. a claim for $228 against these plaintiffs, only $41.01 was due to the defendant from these plaintiffs. These plaintiffs…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Le Guen v. GouverneurCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1798
  2. Loomis v. PulverNew York Supreme Court · 1812
  3. Walker v. AmesNew York Supreme Court · 1823

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schneider v. SchneiderNew York Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API