Barko v. Halliburton Company
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF'COLUMBIA ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ex rel. HARRY BARKO ) ) Plaintiff-Relator, ) ) v. ) Civil Case No. 05-1276 ) HALLI_BURTON COMPANY e_t al., ) ) Defendants`. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION After more than a` decade of litigation, twelve opinions by three different district judges, and two writs of mandamus from the Court of Appeals, this Court grant`ed summary judgment for defendants in this qui tam suit, rejecting Barko’s claim that government contractor KBR (a Halliburton subsidiary) engaged in improper procurement practices. A few weeks later,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State of Illinois v. Sangamo Construction Co. And J. L. Simmons Company, Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Mother and Father v. James CassidyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Richard W. Barber, Personal Representative of the Estate of Barbara W. Reese, Deceased v. John J. Ruth and Lucille A. RuthCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Baez v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Cbt Flint Partners, LLC v. Return Path, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.