American Guaranty Co. v. American Fidelity Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Ohio; John E. Sater, Judge. Action by the American Fidelity Company against the American Guaranty Company. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
McCAEE, District Judge.
In this case a jury was waived by proper stipulation and the case heard before the District Judge. Separate findings of fact and conclusions of law were made by the District Court, and a judgment rendered against the defendant below, from which it prosecutes error to this court. For convenience we shall refer to the Fidelity Company, defendant in error, as plaintiff, and to *898the Guaranty Company, plaintiff in error, as defendant, as they appeared in the court below.
These undisputed facts appear on the pleadings: In December, 1913, the plaintiff became surety on a bond in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- De Witt v. BerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Berry v. Cooper & BoykinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1859
- Bowling v. HarrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
- Carey v. DonohueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
- Pugh v. SnodgrassCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Walters v. First National BankOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Pickands, Mather & Co. v. H. A. &. D. W. Kuhn & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1925