Legal Opinion

Fishburne v. Short

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 17, 1977No. 20431PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gregory, Justice.

By consent of the parties, these automobile accident cases were consolidated for purposes of trial. The jury awarded respondent Julia F. Fishburne $3,650.00 actual damages and respondent Dorothy M. Fishburne $2,840.00 actual damages. The appellant, Harry L. Short, excepts to the denial of his motion for judgment non obstante veredicto or in the alternative a new trial, and to the judge’s charge to the jury of the mortuary table, Section 26-12 of the Code (Cum. Supp. 1975). We find no prejudicial error, and affirm.

While respondents were seated in their MGB automobile waiting…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Yaun v. BaldridgeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
  2. Boyleston v. BaxleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Precopio v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Abofreka v. Alston Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  3. Daniels v. BernardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  4. Hall v. PALMETTO ENTR. II, INC., OF CLINTONCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  5. Gethers v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API