Legal Opinion

Riehl v. Miller

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 8, 1934No. Appeal, 218PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

Appellant, a taxpayer, filed a class bill, praying, inter alia, that defendants, alleged “for the past ten years [to] have been duly elected directors of the poor,” be surcharged with unlawful expenditure of money in the purchase of three tracts of land for the Allegheny County Home. Answers denying liability were filed. The chan cellor entered a decree nisi ordering payment to the Allegheny County Home. Exceptions were sustained by the court in banc, which was of opinion that “there is no evidence to establish fraud as a fact on the part of the defendants. ...”…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Skelton v. Lower Merion TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Commonwealth v. ReitzelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1845
  3. Lackawanna County's AppealsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. O'Gara County Comrs. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Senor v. Dunbar Township School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co.'s AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Brady Township v. AshleyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Turtle Creek Borough AuditSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Punxsutawney v. Mitchell (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Gribble v. MillerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API