Legal Opinion

Smith v. Internal Revenue Service

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided March 31, 2021No. 2:20-cv-02439Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS GARY LEE SMITH, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 2:20-CV-02439-JAR-JPO UNITED STATES, Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiff Gary Lee Smith brings this action pro se against Defendant, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) (referred to herein as the “United States” where appropriate),1 seeking a tax refund of $384.00. This matter is now before the Court on the United States’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 9). Plaintiff failed to file a response to the motion, and the time to do so has expired.2 Under D. Kan. Rule 7.4, Absent a showing of…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  2. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Louise Whitney v. State of New Mexico Charles Patrick, Employee of the State of New Mexico John/jane Doe, Unknown Employees of the State of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  5. David Holt, as Personal Representative of the Estates of James W. Holt and Joan Holt, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API