Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. Pataki

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 28, 2003No. 02 Civ. 618(RMB)(FM), 02 Civ. 3239(RMB)(FM)PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

MAAS, United States Magistrate Judge.

1. Introduction

These consolidated actions (hereinafter, “action”) challenging the New York Legislature’s 2002 State Senate and Congressional redistricting plans are pending before Chief Circuit Judge Walker and District Judges Berman and Koeltl. 1 The three-judge court recently denied the defendants’ motion to dismiss, concluding that any determination on the merits before the plaintiffs were afforded an opportunity to engage in discovery would be premature. See Rodriguez v. Pataki, 274 F.Supp.2d 363, 2003 WL 21782327 (S.D.N.Y.2003). 2…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Tenney v. BrandhoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Citizens Union of New York v. Attorney General of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  2. Jefferson Community Health Care Centers, Inc. v. Jefferson Parish GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  3. Favors v. CuomoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
  4. Bethune-Hill v. Virginia State Board of ElectionsDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
  5. Harris v. Arizona Independent Redistricting CommissionDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2014

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API