Lawrence v. State

OPINION

DAVIS, Commissioner.

This is an appeal from a conviction foi sale of marihuana with punishment assessed at five years. The trial was before the court upon a plea of not guilty.

Appellant’s sole contention is that there was insufficient evidence to establish appellant as a principal to the offense.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the trial court’s judgment, the record reveals the following probative facts which implicate appellant. Officer Sides, of the Austin Police Department, testified that he and an informant named Willie Eaton met appellant at 2212 San *276Gabriel, in…