Legal Opinion

Bearden v. Metropolitan Dade County

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 22, 1972No. 71-518PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant Ralph H. Bearden, Jr., filed a class action challenging the validity of Ordinance No. 70-27 of Metropolitan Dade County, which imposed an excise tax on purchases of designated utility services in the unincorporated area of Dade County. Pertinent provisions thereof were:

“There is hereby levied and imposed by the county upon every purchase in the unincorporated area of electricity, metered gas, bottled gas, fuel oil, telephone service, and water service, included in or reflected by any bill rendered by the seller to the purchaser an excise tax which shall be determined as follows:
“…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of St. Petersburg v. Briley, Wild & Assoc., Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1970
  2. State Ex Rel. Dade County v. BrautigamSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
  3. Burton v. Dade CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1964
  4. Lott, Et Vir v. City of OrlandoSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  5. Dressel v. Dade CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Dade County v. NuzumSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  2. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1974
  3. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1974
  4. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1974
  5. Bearden v. Metropolitan Dade CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API