Legal Opinion
Bearden v. Metropolitan Dade County
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 22, 1972No. 71-518PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
The appellant Ralph H. Bearden, Jr., filed a class action challenging the validity of Ordinance No. 70-27 of Metropolitan Dade County, which imposed an excise tax on purchases of designated utility services in the unincorporated area of Dade County. Pertinent provisions thereof were:
“There is hereby levied and imposed by the county upon every purchase in the unincorporated area of electricity, metered gas, bottled gas, fuel oil, telephone service, and water service, included in or reflected by any bill rendered by the seller to the purchaser an excise tax which shall be determined as follows:
“…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of St. Petersburg v. Briley, Wild & Assoc., Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1970
- State Ex Rel. Dade County v. BrautigamSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
- Burton v. Dade CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1964
- Lott, Et Vir v. City of OrlandoSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
- Dressel v. Dade CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
3Cited by5 opinions
- State ex rel. Dade County v. NuzumSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
- Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1974
- Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1974
- Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1974
- Bearden v. Metropolitan Dade CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1972