Legal Opinion

Highway Const. Co. of Ohio, Inc. v. City of Miami

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 25, 1942No. 9938PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCORD, Circuit Judge.

The highway Construction Company of Ohio, Inc., brought suit against the City of Miami, Florida, to recover amounts alleged to be due for work performed and materials furnished in and about the construction and improvement of certain streets and sewers of the City. The case was tried to a jury. After a three-months trial, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendant on all claims with the exception of one for $23,263.15 which the City admitted it owed. Judgment was entered in accordance with the verdict, and the Construction Company appealed.

After due…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Brasfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Northern Assurance Co. v. Grand View Building Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. Martinsburg & Potomac Railroad v. MarchSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. United States v. GleasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. Sweeney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Chicago Sugar Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
  2. E. C. Ernst, Inc. v. General Motors Corp., and the Whiting-Turner Contracting CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  3. Broward County Port Authority v. Arundel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
  4. Rea Construction Company and Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. B. B. McCormick & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  5. Goodwin, Inc. v. City of LafayetteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API