Legal Opinion
Franklin v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided July 20, 1993No. 80917PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HANSEN, Chief Judge:
Appellants (Parents) seek review of the trial court’s judgment, rendered on jury verdicts, finding the child D.C.H. was deprived as to Parents, and terminating Parents’ rights as to both children. We affirm.
This action was initiated in November 1990, with Appellee’s (State) filing of a petition alleging the child K.L.H. was deprived. The petition further alleged K.L.H. had been physically abused while in the custody of Parents, having suffered bruising to the face, collar bone and back, and that Parents’ explanation of the bruising was inconsistent with…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Matter of A.D.B.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- In re Stacy W.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980
3Cited by9 opinions
- D.H. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- In Re Oklahoma Uniform Jury Instructions for Juvenile CasesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- F.B. v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999
- State v. Deborah C.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000
- Matter of KLHCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.