Legal Opinion

United States v. Field

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided June 9, 1994No. 3:94-cr-00013PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

CRABB, Chief Judge.

In a report and recommendation entered on May 6,1994, the United States Magistrate Judge recommended that the court deny defendant’s motions to identify an informant and to produce sentencing guideline information and grant defendant’s motion to suppress evidence. The government has filed objections to the report; defendant has advised the court he has no objections to it, with the exception of one sentence in which reference is made to the defendant’s growing marijuana on his property. For the reasons that follow, I adopt the recommendations of the magistrate judge in…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. United States v. Rohn Martin Ishmael and Debra K. IshmaelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. Jerry FordCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. Christopher Paul Cusumano, United States of America v. Robert William PorcoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  4. Commonwealth v. GindlespergerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. State v. LewisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API