Hazen v. Hill Betts & Nash, LLP
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Catterson, J.
In this employment discrimination action arising from the termination of the petitioner attorney by the respondent law firm, we reiterate that a petitioner’s disability does not shield him from the consequences of workplace misconduct.
Respondent Hill Betts & Nash (hereinafter referred to as HBN) terminated the petitioner, James Hazen, effective March
6, 2006, upon discovering that the petitioner charged hotel rooms, limousines, alcohol, adult movies and calls to escort services to his corporate American Express card and then attempted to have these charges…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- New York City Transit Authority v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- City of New York v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Valentine v. Standard & Poor'sDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Pimentel v. Citibank, N.A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Whitehurst v. 1199seiu United Healthcare Workers E.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Gordon v. Consolidated Edison Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Gordon v. KadetAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Matter of Briggs v. New York State Div. of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Duckett v. New York Presbyterian HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.