Legal Opinion

United States v. Mahoney-Meyer

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 22, 2008No. Nos. 07-30430, 07-30432PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Christine Mahoney-Meyer and Margaret Jose (“Defendants”) appeal their convictions of conspiracy to violate the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d), the object of which was to participate in the distribution of contraband cigarettes in violation of the Contraband Cigarette Trafficking Act (“CCTA”), 18 U.S.C. § 2342(a).1 We affirm.

Although Defendants contend that their actions were authorized by tribal law, both the Coeur d’Alene tribal law and constitution are subject to limitations imposed by federal law. In Baker, 63 F.3d 1478,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Salinas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Washington v. Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian ReservationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. SmiskinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ted GORD, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Funds From First Regional Bank Account XXXXX1859 Held in the Name of R K Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API