Boleman Law Firm, P.C. v. United States Trustee
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SPENCER, Chief Judge.
The Boleman Law Firm (“Boleman Firm”) appeals the Bankruptcy Court’s Order entered on April 27, 2006, denying its request for supplemental fees and costs. The Court heard argument on November 13, 2006, and the matter is now ripe for decision. For the reasons stated below, the Bankruptcy Court’s Order is AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
I
The Boleman Firm, which is headquartered in Richmond, Virginia, provides bankruptcy services to consumer debtors. 1 Between March 21, 2005,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Westberry v. Gislaved Gummi ABCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Harman v. LevinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Service News CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re MitranoDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009
- In Re RobinsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007
- Pope v. Vu (In Re Vu)District Court, D. Maryland · 2007
- In Re WycheUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010
- In Re Vernon-WilliamsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.