Hamlin v. City of New Bedford
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtGaednee, J.
The Sfc. of 1888, c. 176, § 1, authorizes the city council of the city of New Bedford “ to lay out an easterly extension of Howland Street in said city over the tide waters of the Acushnet River.” The city council laid out the street, took land of the petitioner, and awarded him damages. Being dissatisfied with the amount awarded, he filed a petition in the Superior Court to have his damages assessed by a jury. Atrial was had, and a verdict was returned for a less amount than had been awarded him by the city council. The Superior Court *193ruled that, on this state of facts, the respondent was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gifford v. Inhabitants of DartmouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
- Williams v. City of TauntonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
- Dickinson v. Amherst Water Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
3Cited by3 opinions
- Driscoll v. City of TauntonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
- Barnes v. City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Grimshaw v. City of Fall RiverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894