Legal Opinion

MidAmerican Energy Co. v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided June 30, 2000No. 22728-97; No. 22729-97; No. 22730-97; No. 22731-97PublishedCited by 12 opinions

P is a public utility engaged in the retail distribution of natural gas, electricity, and related services. In 1987, in response to the enactment of sec. 451(f), I.R.C., P modified its method of accounting for tax purposes to coincide with its financial and regulatory accounting method and made a sec. 481 adjustment. Federal income tax rates were reduced in 1986 pursuant to the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub.

Read the full summary

P is a public utility engaged in the retail distribution of natural gas, electricity, and related services. In 1987, in response to the enactment of sec. 451(f), I.R.C., P modified its method of accounting for tax purposes to coincide with its financial and regulatory accounting method and made a sec. 481 adjustment. Federal income tax rates were reduced in 1986 pursuant to the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. L. 99-514, sec. 821, 100 Stat. 2372, creating an excess in deferred Federal income tax. P was required to adjust utility rates from 1987 through 1990 to compensate for this overcollection.…

1Opinion of the Court

Cohen, Judge:

Respondent determined the following deficiencies in the Federal income tax of MidAmerican Energy Co. (petitioner):

TYE Deficiency

Dec. 31, 1984 $698,682

Dec. 31, 1987 171,396

Dec. 31, 1988 994.913

Dec. 31, 1989 1,457,191

Dec. 31, 1989 715,208

Nov. 7, 1990 391.914

Dec. 31, 1990 5,121,384

On November 7, 1990, a merger took place, resulting in a short tax year.

After concessions by the parties, the issues for decision in these consolidated cases are whether petitioner’s accrual of income from furnishing utility services was in accordance with section 451(f), whether the amount reported by…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. North American Oil Consolidated v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Thor Power Tool Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. Skelly Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Jess Kraft and Barbara Kraft v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  5. Marshall M. Chernin Ida Raye Chernin, Cross-Appellants/appellees v. United States of America, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cinergy Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  2. Fla. Progress Corp. v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2000
  3. Midamerican Energy Company v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  4. Roth v. C.I.R.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  5. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API