People v. Simmons
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to any of defendant’s arguments that he was deprived of effective assistance of counsel. Defendant did not show that his counsel was ineffective because counsel failed to request Wade and Mapp hearings (see, People v Rivera, 71 NY2d 705, 709; People v Love, 57 NY2d 998, 1000; People v Brown, 122 AD2d 546, lv denied 68 NY2d 810). Defense counsel effectively and competently conducted a Huntley hearing, argued the motion for severance, and cross-examined the People’s witnesses. Counsel presented a cogent theory of defense and delivered…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. RiveraNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. SatterfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. LoveNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. MelvinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- BROOMFIELD, TIMOTHY D., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015