Legal Opinion
State v. Bell
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided December 9, 2009No. 2009-K-0574PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL A. BONIN, Judge.
|, Richard Bell moved to suppress from evidence at his trial a .357 Magnum and a marijuana “cigar” seized from his bedroom by a police officer who had entered his apartment without a warrant. La. C. Cr. P. art. 703 A. The district court denied the motion to suppress and Mr. Bell applied for supervisory writs in this court. See La. Const. Art. V, § 10(A) and La. C. Cr. P. art. 912.1 C(1). We ordered additional briefing as well as oral argument in order to more closely examine Mr. Bell’s contention that the prosecution had not established one of the limited and…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Commonwealth v. JewettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
- State v. FrancisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
- State v. McClendonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- State v. HarrisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- State v. CarterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.