Legal Opinion
Wheeler v. Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided October 15, 1970No. [No. 22, September Term, 1970.]PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcWilliams, J.
Code, Art. 66V2, Sec. 154 (a) (1967 Repl. Vol.) requires one who intends to make a claim against the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund (Fund), “as a condition precedent” to his right thereafter to apply for payment from the Fund, to “give notice” to the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Board (Board) of such intention within 180 days after the accident or “within 30 days” of receiving a disclaimer of liability from the insurer of the person who “caused him to suffer damages.” The Board says it received no such notice from the appellants. They say they mailed a proper notice to the Board…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Szczesny v. VasquezNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- Maddy v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- Williams v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- Montgomery County Board of Education Ex Rel. Carrier Corp. v. Glassman Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bright v. Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund BoardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Frazier v. Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund BoardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- Riley v. AbramsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Wright v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- D'Ambrogi v. Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund BoardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.