Legal Opinion

Commercial Union Assurance Co. v. Hyman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 6, 1980No. QQ-194PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The employer/carrier appeals, and the claimant cross-appeals, a workers’ compensation order, which we affirm except as to the award of permanent partial disability benefits based on diminution of wage earning capacity, and as to the amount of attorney’s fee awarded.

Any consideration of wage earning capacity loss in this case is precluded by the claimant’s complete failure to test her employability in the open labor market after reaching maximum medical improve*457ment. Exxon Co. USA v. Alexis, 370 So.2d 1128 (Fla.1978). We further note that the order appealed is facially inadequate, in that it…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Exxon Co. v. AlexisSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  2. Pierce v. Piper Aircraft CorporationSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  3. Vargas v. Americana of Bal HarbourSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  4. Aetna Maintenance Corp. v. La BaffDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Flesche v. Interstate WarehouseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  2. DEPT. OF OFFENDER REHAB. v. GodwinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  3. Orange County Board of County Commissioners v. HansonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API