Legal Opinion

Kendrick v. Hamblin

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 30, 2015No. 14-3301PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Sean Kendrick has sued prison officials under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 asserting that, in violation of due process and the Eighth Amendment, they incarcerated him for 17 months beyond what he calls his mandatory release date. He seeks money damages and, since he is now on parole, an early end to his parole. The district court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim because Kendrick’s release date was not mandatory. Because Kendrick was not deprived of a protectable liberty interest, no constitutional violation occurred, so we affirm the judgment.

Kendrick was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Board of Pardons v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. DeCap v. JeffreysDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2021
  2. Detlaff v. BossDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2020
  3. Simpson v. RadtkeDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2024
  4. West v. SwiekatowskiDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API