Legal Opinion
De Wald v. Quarnstrom
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided July 15, 1952PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
60 So.2d 919 (1952)
DE WALD
v.
QUARNSTROM.
Supreme Court of Florida, en Banc.
July 15, 1952.
Rehearing Denied August 2, 1952.
Nichols, Gaither & Green and Evans, Mershon, Sawyer, Johnston & Simmons, and William O. Mehrtens, Miami, for appellant.
Knight, Smith & Underwood, Miami, and Fleming, O'Bryan & Fleming, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
2Per curiam
Affirmed.
SEBRING, C.J., and THOMAS, HOBSON and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.
TERRELL, CHAPMAN and MATHEWS, JJ., concurring specially.
CHAPMAN, Justice (concurring specially).
This appeal involves the legal sufficiency of an amended declaration. The suit was brought under…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Cormier v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
- McMillan, Et Vir v. NelsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
- Russ v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
- Dexter v. GreenSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
- Hollander v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by28 opinions
- City of Miami v. SandersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Jackson v. Consolidated Government of City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
- Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Crane v. LoftinSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Faircloth v. HillSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.